Shop More Submit  Join Login
×




Details

Submitted on
December 27, 2013
Image Size
212 KB
Resolution
3506×1196
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
1,109
Favourites
47 (who?)
Comments
24
Downloads
27
×
Candeleros Cast by RessurexStudios Candeleros Cast by RessurexStudios
Well, we here at Ressurrex suppose it's a fine time now to announce our newest project: a webcomic! I'm not going to go much into what the comic is about, but it does involve both human and prehistoric animal interaction, and I hope you guys will enjoy it. While we're preparing for our big debut, here's a little taste of what to expect: the cast for the first setting, in Early Cretaceous Argentina.

Left to right: Limaysaurus, Andesaurus, Ekrixinatosaurus, Giganotosaurus (M,F), Bicentenaria, Alnashetri (M,F), Mitchell.

Add a Comment:
 
:icondavidy12:
Davidy12 Featured By Owner Mar 3, 2014
If I know what it is, I'm betting it'll be up within (PRAYING) 8 days. ;)
Reply
:iconblazze92:
bLAZZE92 Featured By Owner Jan 31, 2014
Ekrixinatosaurus was no where near that big.
Reply
:iconressurexstudios:
RessurexStudios Featured By Owner Jun 1, 2014
We know. We're taking a touch of artistic liberty on this one.
Reply
:icontmac1kobe8vc15:
tmac1kobe8vc15 Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2014
Well, isn't the upper estimate somewhere near 11m? Even so, it is still oversized.
Reply
:iconblazze92:
bLAZZE92 Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2014
Yes, but said estimate was based on the absolute size of the skull, ignoring the known postcranial material, not to mention that it also ignored the difference in shape between the skull bones, the original 7 to 8m estimates are more accurate IMO.
Reply
:icontmac1kobe8vc15:
tmac1kobe8vc15 Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2014
Agreed. That's why I said upper estimate. 7 to 8m is definitely the more accurate estimate.
Regardless, the Ekrixinatosaurs in the picture is over sized. No way it is larger than a Giganotosaurus.
Reply
:icontheropod1:
theropod1 Featured By Owner Mar 16, 2014
yes, even an 11m abelisaur (assuming it was proportioned like that) wouldn’t outmatch a 12.4m+ Carcharodontosaur in terms of bulk.
Reply
:icondracorexius:
Dracorexius Featured By Owner Jan 13, 2014
Shouldn't the Sauropods neck and tails be a little thicker?? they look a little thin possibly shrink wrapped?
Reply
:iconressurexstudios:
RessurexStudios Featured By Owner Jun 1, 2014
we havent finished entirely with the modeling. thank you for your feedback.
Reply
:iconrandomdinos:
randomdinos Featured By Owner Jan 3, 2014
Wow, them models. Like everyone else, I like how you managed to represent the animals of a certain time period (a.k.a no Argentinosaurus=Giganotosaurus) but that Andesaurus looks too small, wasn't it supposed to be close to Argent's size?
Reply
Add a Comment: